\author{Chris Rowley} \title{Chair's report on 1993--94} \begin{Article} First, a big thank you to all my colleagues on the Committee for all their hard work during the last year. The notable innovation in 1994 has been the regular appearance of \BV. Under the editorship of Sebastian Rahtz, and with Robin Fairbairns and Jonathan Fine as publisher and distributor, issues of our newsletter now reach members approximately every two months. It contains an interesting variety of \TeX-related articles in addition to notices of meetings and subscription forms. In my opinion, \BV\ is the best in content and, by a wide margin, in timeliness of all the journals and newsletters produced by \TeX\ user groups. Thanks to Sebastian, Robin and Jonathan, and also to all those who have written items for \BV. Four meetings were held during the year. A meeting on `Front Ends to \TeX' was held at Aston University on 20~October 1993, after the AGM. This was organized by Sebastian Rahtz and Peter Abbott, and was attended by about 30~people. Talks and demonstrations were given by Adrian Clark, Nikos Drakos, Jonathan Fine, Christopher Mabb and Sebastian Rahtz. On 18~January 1994 a meeting was held at Rewley House in Oxford on the theme `Choosing and Using PostScript Fonts with \TeX'. It was organized by Alan Jeffrey, Sebastian Rahtz and Ian Hall, and was attended by about 30~people. Talks were given by Angus Duggan, Alan Jeffrey, Sebastian Rahtz and Will Shaman, and the meeting concluded with a panel session. The big meeting of the year was the two-day meeting at the University of Warwick: `\LaTeXe: the conference', on 21--22~March 1994. It was organized by Malcolm Clark and me. The talks by members of the \LaTeX3 Project Team (Johannes Braams, David Carlisle, Alan Jeffrey, Frank Mittelbach and me) and Michel Goossens introduced the audience of 80 to the philosophy and features of the new standard version of \LaTeX, which had been released in beta-test in December 1993 and whose first full release was in June 1994. On 11~July 1994 a training meeting `\LaTeX\ fonts and graphics: a hands-on tutorial' was held in Cambridge. The organizers were Robin Fairbairns and Jonathan Fine; the trainer was Alan Jeffrey, and extra training material was provided by David Carlisle. The 13~participants found the meeting very worthwhile: it was a pity that no more people wanted to attend. Thanks to all the organizers, speakers and trainers for making these meetings possible. Especial thanks to Malcolm Clark, who so successfully was the local organizer for the residential meeting. Other members of the Committee may have been less visible, but have been doing sterling work in the background. For example, Peter Abbott is to be congratulated on sorting out the Group's accounts and financial position. Peter has also increased the range of services available to members, who can now buy, in addition to a range of books, disc sets of em\TeX{} and Oz\TeX{} at cost price, and the CDROM of \TeX ware produced by the NTG. The `Aston Archive' has hitherto been strictly separated from the \UKTUG. However, during the year it was brought to the Committee's attention that the Archive might not be able to continue at Aston University. The Committee felt that the Archive is a considerable service to members of the \shortuk, and so took upon itself the investigation of another suitable home for it. After the investigation of several possible homes, a smooth transfer of the Archive to Cambridge University has now been achieved. Thanks to Roger Needham at Cambridge for authorizing this; and to Robin Fairbairns, Martyn Johnson and Sebastian Rahtz for organizing the changeover and maintaining this UK node of the CTAN. A brief history of the relationship between \TeX{} and Aston university has already appeared in these annals but I should like to formally record here the enormous debt of gratitude owed by this group and the world-wide \TeX{} community to Peter Abbott for organising the large range of activities that made Aston the centre of the \TeX{} universe for many years. Finally, I should say something about TUG and our relationship with it. As a result of discussions at the TUG meeting at Santa Barbara in July 1994, the relationship between TUG and the various other user groups has come under scrutiny. It is possible that the role of TUG will change. There were further discussions at the Euro\TeX\ meeting in Gda\'nsk in September 1994, but the picture is still far from clear. I will keep members of \shortuk\ informed of developments. \end{Article}