\begin{multicols}{2}[\Section{Walnut Creek \TeX\ CDROM}] \let\Section\section \title{Part 1: A user's view} \author{J. M. Bowsher} \begin{article} I first heard of the \emph{Walnut Creek} \TeX\ CDROM (actually a pair of disks) when my faithful hardware and software suppliers {\it Systems Solutions} sent me a list of their latest CDROMs. I asked Peter Abbott about it when I renewed my subscription to \ukt, and he surprised me by sending me a copy to review and asking me to write down my opinions as one who works alone and is not connected to a network. The packaging is the usual for a pair of CDs, but the first thing I noticed was the depressing little message on the first disk ``type GO to start''; this warned me that the suppliers had IBM PC users only in mind. Fortunately, the disks are in ISO~9660 format, so my Atari ST was able to read them with no problems --- I expect that other platforms would have no difficulty either. However, I found when I accessed the first `readme' file that \emph{Walnut Creek} have used a format for informative text files which required me to use my word processor to read them; the ROM based ASCII text reader I normally use placed all the text, apart from the first couple of lines, off the right hand edge of the screen. \emph{Walnut Creek} provide in the root partition of the first disk what they claim is a powerful and versatile viewer, but they have failed to help workers on platforms other than the IBM PC --- there are no viewing programs for other systems. The root partition `readme' file told me that the CDROM contains, \emph{inter alia}, a snapshot of the \textsc{ctan} archive taken between February and March 1995; it would therefore seem to be of considerable utility to the \TeX\ community; I look forward to reading the second part of this review by a \TeX\ expert. The first thing \emph{I} did after reading that first `readme' file was rush to the `systems' folder and see what was in it. The following systems are included: Acorn Archimedes, Amiga, Atari, Common \TeX, Knuth (Knuth's original sources), Mac, MSDOS, NT, OS2, Unix, VM-cms, VMS, web2c. I next discovered --- and this, I feel, is a very serious drawback --- that at least four different compression algorithms are used on this pair of disks. After only a few minutes searching around, I found \texttt{ARC}, \texttt{LZH}, \texttt{ZIP} and \texttt{ZOO} extensions, but no decompression facilities were provided in any of the systems sub-folders I looked through. I feel that the suppliers should have placed in each of the `systems' sub-folders, a set for \emph{that} system of executable decompression programs for every compression method used. Those on systems using $8 + 3$ character file names should be aware that some of the files on this CDROM do not use this naming convention. Obviously, I opened the Atari sub-folder first, but had to search through my floppy storage box to unearth a \texttt{ZOO} decompresser (I have never before had occasion to use \texttt{ZOO}) before I could discover that it contained version 7.00 of the Christoph Strunk \TeX\ shell I use, and also a late version of the alternative Lindner shell. I installed version 7.00 on my machine as it is very pleasant to use English commands, but was sad to see that much of the supporting documentation is still in German. There are also several folders of useful utilities including, for example, many \texttt{dvi}~$\rightarrow$~printer drivers. Who knows, one of the 600~dpi laser printer drivers may even work! A quick survey of other systems revealed that they seem to be provided for in a similar manner. I couldn't check that things worked, of course, but there were folders full of what looked like comparable material to that I had gone through in my native folder. I leave the discussion of the other, more basic, \TeX\ material to my fellow reviewer. I noticed lots of useful stuff; for example, hundreds of fonts (including a way of using printer resident Hewlett Packard laser fonts) in addition to the expected \texttt{cm}, \texttt{dc} etc. Thus my opinion is that this CDROM would be a versatile addition to almost anyone's collection provided they have the patience (if not using an IBM PC) to sort out decompression and file location problems. My file finding accessory deserved a much needed rest after working on this CDROM for a few hours! \end{article} \title{Part 2: An archivist's view} \author{Sebastian Rahtz} \begin{article} There have been four \textsc{ctan} CDROM collections that we know of. There were sections on CD even before the formal `opening' of the archive setup by George Greenwade in 1993 at Aston, thanks to Prime Time Freeware's offering, but the first full set was that issued by PTF in mid 1994. They planned a yearly update, but we are still waiting for a second edition; meanwhile, Walnut Creek issued their two disk set in mid 1995, and recently the German \TeX\ Users Group, Dante, has produced another one, which has not yet been seen in the UK (it is for `members only', in that delightfully open way Dante has). When the Prime Time Freeware CD came out, it was criticized for being all compressed using ZIP (which was better than the myriad methods used on the 1992 disk), which meant that all of \LaTeX, for instance, was in one giant archive. The Walnut Creek CD is better, because everything is uncompressed, as you would find it on the archives (from a year ago --- and much has changed since then), but the downside is that because there are two disks, what you want is always on the other one. Apart from that, it is a great convenience having a \textsc{ctan} snapshot at home, or in an unconnected office, and I congratulate Walnut Creek for producing it. Is a \textsc{ctan} dump a good idea, however? The most successful \TeX\ CD is the 4All\TeX\ offering from NTG, which allows DOS users to run straight from a mounted disk if they like, and this can never be the case with a \textsc{ctan} dump. Do users want an archive, or a usable file system? With the increasing use of compound \texttt{docstrip} sources for \LaTeX\ packages, we need to \emph{install} material before we use it. The standard directory structure recently described by the TUG TDS working group is a vital stage in making the dream of a complete, usable, \TeX\ file system on a single CD come true, and I expect to see an offering this year. We need both \textsc{ctan} dumps for the unconnected, and TDS standard file systems for `plug-n-play'ers. \textsc{ctan} will continue to provide the raw material, but I hope that CD producers will spend more on adding value, and understanding the content. The Walnut Creek CD is useful, but not very useful for the complete beginner; it has not been done in consultation with the \textsc{ctan} maintainers, which is a pity. \end{article} \end{multicols}