recount workflow: accessing over 70,000 human RNA-seq samples with Bioconductor
2 May 2018
Abstract
The recount2 resource is composed of over 70,000 uniformly processed human RNA-seq samples spanning TCGA and SRA, including GTEx. The processed data can be accessed via the recount2 website and therecount Bioconductor package. This workflow explains in detail how to use the recount package and how to integrate it with other Bioconductor packages for several analyses that can be carried out with the recount2 resource. In particular, we describe how the coverage count matrices were computed in recount2 as well as different ways of obtaining public metadata, which can facilitate downstream analyses. Step-by-step directions show how to do a gene-level differential expression analysis, visualize base-level genome coverage data, and perform an analyses at multiple feature levels. This workflow thus provides further information to understand the data in recount2 and a compendium of R code to use the data.
R version: R version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
Bioconductor version: 3.7
Package: 1.2.0
1 Introduction
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is now the most widely used high-throughput assay for measuring gene expression. In a typical RNA-seq experiment, several million reads are sequenced per sample. The reads are often aligned to the reference genome using a splice-aware aligner to identify where reads originated. Resulting alignment files are then used to compute count matrices for several analyses such as identifying differentially expressed genes. The Bioconductor project (1) has many contributed packages that specialize in analyzing this type of data and previous workflows have explained how to use them (2–4). Initial steps are typically focused on generating the count matrices. Some pre-computed matrices have been made available via the ReCount project (5) or Bioconductor Experiment data packages such as the airway dataset (6). The pre-computed count matrices in ReCount have been useful to RNA-seq methods developers and to researchers seeking to avoid the computationally intensive process of creating these matrices. In the years since ReCount was published, hundreds of new RNA-seq projects have been carried out, and researchers have shared the data publicly.
We recently uniformly processed over 70,000 publicly available human RNA-seq samples, and made the data available via the recount2 resource (7) at jhubiostatistics.shinyapps.io/recount/. Samples in recount2 are grouped by project (over 2,000) originating from the Sequence Read Archive, the Genotype-Tissue Expression study (GTEx) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The processed data can be accessed via the recount Bioconductor package available at bioconductor.org/packages/recount. Together, recount2 and the recount Bioconductor package should be considered a successor to ReCount.
Due to space constraints, the recount2 publication (7) did not cover how to use the recount package and other useful information for carrying out analyses with recount2 data. We describe how the count matrices in recount2 were generated. We also review the R code necessary for using the recount2 data, whose details are important because some of this code involves multiple Bioconductor packages and changing default options. We further show: (a) how to augment metadata that comes with datasets with metadata learned from natural language processing of associated papers as well as expression data (b) how to perform differential expression analyses, and (c) how to visualize the base-pair data available from recount2.
2 Analysis of RNA-seq data available at recount2
2.1 recount2 overview
The recount2 resource provides expression data summarized at different feature levels to enable novel cross-study analyses. Generally when investigators use the term expression, they think about gene expression. But more information can be extracted from RNA-seq data. Once RNA-seq reads have been aligned to the reference genome it is possible to determine the number of aligned reads overlapping each base-pair resulting in the genome base-pair coverage curve as shown in Figure 1. In the example shown in Figure 1, most of the reads overlap known exons from a gene. Those reads can be used to compute a count matrix at the exon or gene feature levels. Some reads span exon-exon junctions (jx) and while most match the annotation, some do not (jx 3 and 4). An exon-exon junction count matrix can be used to identify differentially expressed junctions, which can show which isoforms are differentially expressed given sufficient coverage. For example, junctions 2 and 5 are unique to isoform 2, while junction 6 is unique to isoform 1. The genome base-pair coverage data can be used with derfinder (8) to identify expressed regions; some of them could be unannotated exons, which together with the exon-exon junction data could help establish new isoforms.
Figure 1: Overview of the data available in recount2
Reads (pink boxes) aligned to the reference genome can be used to compute a base-pair coverage curve and identify exon-exon junctions (split reads). Gene and exon count matrices are generated using annotation information providing the gene (green boxes) and exon (blue boxes) coordinates together with the base-level coverage curve. The reads spanning exon-exon junctions (jx) are used to compute a third count matrix that might include unannotated junctions (jx 3 and 4). Without using annotation information, expressed regions (orange box) can be determined from the base-level coverage curve to then construct data-driven count matrices.
recount2 provides gene, exon, and exon-exon junction count matrices both in text format and RangedSummarizedExperiment objects (rse) (9) as shown in Figure 2. These rse objects provide information about the expression features (for example gene IDs) and the samples. In this workflow we will explain how to add metadata to the rse objects in recount2 in order to ask biological questions. recount2 also provides coverage data in the form of bigWig files. All four features can be accessed with the recount Bioconductor package (7). recount also allows sending queries to snaptron (10) to search for specific exon-exon junctions.
Figure 2: recount2 provides coverage count matrices in RangedSummarizedExperiment (rse) objects
Once the rse object has been downloaded and loaded into R, the feature information is accessed with rowRanges(rse) (blue box), the counts with assays(rse)$counts (pink box) and the sample metadata with colData(rse) (green box). The sample metadata can be expanded using add_predictions(rse) (orange box) or with custom code (brown box) matching by a unique sample identifier such as the SRA Run ID. The rse object is inside the purple box and matching data is highlighted in each box.
2.2 Packages used in the workflow
In this workflow we will use several Bioconductor packages. To reproduce the entirety of this workflow, install the packages using the following code after installing R 3.4.x from CRAN in order to use Bioconductor version 3.5 or newer.
## Install packages from Bioconductor
source("https://bioconductor.org/biocLite.R")
biocLite(c("recount", "GenomicRanges", "limma", "edgeR", "DESeq2",
"regionReport", "clusterProfiler", "org.Hs.eg.db", "gplots",
"derfinder", "rtracklayer", "GenomicFeatures", "bumphunter",
"derfinderPlot", "devtools"))Once they are installed, load all the packages with the following code.
library("recount")
library("GenomicRanges")
library("limma")
library("edgeR")
library("DESeq2")
library("regionReport")
library("clusterProfiler")
library("org.Hs.eg.db")
library("gplots")
library("derfinder")
library("rtracklayer")
library("GenomicFeatures")
library("bumphunter")
library("derfinderPlot")
library("devtools")2.3 Coverage counts provided by recount2
The most accessible features are the gene, exon and exon-exon junction count matrices. This section explains them in greater detail. Figure 3 shows 16 RNA-seq reads, each 3 base-pairs long, and a reference genome.
Figure 3: RNA-seq starting data
16 RNA-seq un-aligned RNA-seq reads 3 base-pairs long are shown (pink boxes) alongside a reference genome that is 16 base-pairs long (white box).
Reads in the recount2 resource were aligned with the splice-aware Rail-RNA aligner (11). Figure 4 shows the reads aligned to the reference genome. Some of the reads are split as they span an exon-exon junction. Two of the reads were soft clipped meaning that just a portion of the reads aligned (top left in purple).
Figure 4: Aligned RNA-seq reads
Spice-aware RNA-seq aligners such as Rail-RNA are able to find the coordinates to which the reads map, even if they span exon-exon junctions (connected boxes). Rail-RNA soft clips some reads (purple boxes with rough edges) such that a portion of these reads align to the reference genome.
In order to compute the gene and exon count matrices we first have to process the annotation, which for recount2 is Gencode v25 (CHR regions) with hg38 coordinates. Although recount can generate count matrices for other annotations using hg38 coordinates. Figure 5 shows two isoforms for a gene composed of 3 different exons.
Figure 5: Gene annotation
A single gene with two isoforms composed by three distinct exons (blue boxes) is illustrated. Exons 1 and 3 share the first five base-pairs while exon 2 is common to both isoforms.
The coverage curve is at base-pair resolution, so if we are interested in gene counts we have to be careful not to double count base-pairs 1 through 5 that are shared by exons 1 and 3 (Figure 5). Using the function disjoin() from GenomicRanges (12) we identified the distinct exonic sequences (disjoint exons). The following code defines the exon coordinates that match Figure 5 and the resulting disjoint exons for our example gene. The resulting disjoint exons are shown in Figure 6.
library("GenomicRanges")
exons <- GRanges("seq", IRanges(start = c(1, 1, 13), end = c(5, 8, 15)))
exons## GRanges object with 3 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle>
## [1] seq 1-5 *
## [2] seq 1-8 *
## [3] seq 13-15 *
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengthsdisjoin(exons)## GRanges object with 3 ranges and 0 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle>
## [1] seq 1-5 *
## [2] seq 6-8 *
## [3] seq 13-15 *
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths
Figure 6: Disjoint exons
Windows of distinct exonic sequence for the example gene. Disjoint exons 1 and 2 form exon 1.
Now that we have disjoint exons, we can compute the base-pair coverage for each of them as shown in Figure 7. That is, for each base-pair that corresponds to exonic sequence, we compute the number of reads overlapping that given base-pair. For example, the first base-pair is covered by 3 different reads and it does not matter whether the reads themselves were soft clipped. Not all reads or bases of a read contribute information to this step, as some do not overlap known exonic sequence (light pink in Figure 7).
Figure 7: Base-pair coverage counting for exonic base-pairs
At each exonic base-pair we compute the number of reads overlapping that given base-pair. The first base (orange arrow) has 3 reads overlapping that base-pair. Base-pair 11 has a coverage of 3 but does not overlap known exonic sequence, so that information is not used for the gene and exon count matrices (grey arrow). If a read partially overlaps exonic sequence, only the portion that overlaps is used in the computation (see right most read).
With base-pair coverage for the exonic sequences computed, the coverage count for each distinct exon is simply the sum of the base-pair coverage for each base in a given distinct exon. For example, the coverage count for disjoint exon 2 is \(2 + 2 + 3 = 7\) as shown in Figure 8. The gene coverage count is then \(\sum_i^n \texttt{coverage}_i\) where \(n\) is the number of exonic base-pairs for the gene and is equal to the sum of the coverage counts for its disjoint exons as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8: Exon and gene coverage counts
The coverage counts for each disjoint exon are the sum of the base-pair coverage. The gene coverage count is the sum of the disjoint exons coverage counts.
For the exons, recount2 provides the disjoint exons coverage count matrix. It is possible to reconstruct the exon coverage count matrix by summing the coverage count for the disjoint exons that compose each exon. For example, the coverage count for exon 1 would be the sum of the coverage counts for disjoint exons 1 and 2, that is \(19 + 7 = 26\). Some methods might assume that double counting of the shared base-pairs was performed while others assume or recommend the opposite.
2.3.1 Scaling coverage counts
The coverage counts described previously are the ones actually included in the rse objects in recount2 instead of typical read count matrices. This is an important difference to keep in mind as most methods were developed for read count matrices. Part of the sample metadata available from recount2 includes the read length and number of mapped reads. Given a target library size (40 million reads by default), the coverage counts in recount2 can be scaled to read counts for a given library size as shown in Equation (1). Note that the resulting scaled read counts are not necessarily integers so it might be necessary to round them if a differential expression (DE) method assumes integer data.
\[\begin{equation} \frac{\sum_i^n \text{coverage}_i }{\text{Read Length}} * \frac{\text{target}}{\text{mapped}} = \text{scaled read counts} \tag{1} \end{equation}\]From Figure 4 we know that Rail-RNA soft clipped some reads, so a more precise measure than the denominator of Equation (1) is the area under coverage (AUC) which is the sum of the coverage for all base-pairs of the genome, regardless of the annotation as shown in Figure 9. Without soft clipping reads, the AUC would be equal to the number of reads mapped multiplied by the read length. So for our example gene, the scaled counts for a library size of 20 reads would be \(\frac{36}{45} * 20 = 16\) and in general calculated with Equation (2). The following code shows how to compute the AUC given a set of aligned reads and reproduce a portion of Figure 9.
\[\begin{equation} \frac{\sum_i^n \text{coverage}_i }{\text{AUC}} * \text{target} = \text{scaled read counts} \tag{2} \end{equation}\]## Take the example and translate it to R code
library("GenomicRanges")
reads <- GRanges("seq", IRanges(
start = rep(
c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14),
c(3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 1)
), width = rep(
c(1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 3),
c(1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1)
)
))
## Get the base-level genome coverage curve
cov <- as.integer(coverage(reads)$seq)
## AUC
sum(cov)## [1] 45## Code for reproducing the bottom portion of Figure 8.
pdf("base_pair_coverage.pdf", width = 20)
par(mar = c(5, 6, 4, 2) + 0.1)
plot(cov, type = "o", col = "violetred1", lwd = 10, ylim = c(0, 5),
xlab = "Genome", ylab = "Coverage", cex.axis = 2, cex.lab = 3,
bty = "n")
polygon(c(1, seq_len(length(cov)), length(cov)), c(0, cov, 0),
border = NA, density = -1, col = "light blue")
points(seq_len(length(cov)), cov, col = "violetred1", type = "o",
lwd = 10)
dev.off()
Figure 9: Area under coverage (AUC)
The area under coverage is the sum of the base-pair coverage for all positions in the genome regardless of the annotation. It is the area under the base-level coverage curve shown as the light blue area under the pink curve.
The recount function scale_counts() computes the scaled read counts for a target library size of 40 million reads and we highly recommend using it before doing other analyses. The following code shows how to use scale_counts() and that the resulting read counts per sample can be lower than the target size (40 million). This happens when not all mapped reads overlap known exonic base-pairs of the genome. In our example, the gene has a scaled count of 16 reads for a library size of 20 reads, meaning that 4 reads did not overlap exonic sequences.
## Check that the number of reads is less than or equal to 40 million
## after scaling.
library("recount")
rse_scaled <- scale_counts(rse_gene_SRP009615, round = FALSE)
summary(colSums(assays(rse_scaled)$counts)) / 1e6## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 22.62 29.97 34.00 31.96 34.86 36.782.3.2 Enriching the annotation
Data in recount2 can be used for annotation-agnostic analyses and enriching the known annotation. Just like exon and gene coverage count matrices, recount2 provides exon-exon junction count matrices. These matrices can be used to identify new isoforms (Figure 10) or identify differentially expressed isoforms. For example, exon-exon junctions 2, 5 and 6 in Figure 1 are only present in one annotated isoform. Snaptron (10) allows programatic and high-level queries of the exon-exon junction information and its graphical user interface is specially useful for visualizing this data. Inside R, the recount function snaptron_query() can be used for searching specific exon-exon junctions in recount2.
Figure 10: Exon-exon junctions go beyond the annotation
Reads spanning exon-exon junctions are highlighted and compared against the annotation. Three of them match the annotated junctions, but one (blue and orange read) spans an unannotated exon-exon junction with the left end matching the annotation and the right end hinting at a possible new isoform for this gene (blue and orange isoform).
The base-pair coverage data from recount2 can be used together with derfinder (8) to identify expressed regions of the genome, providing another annotation-agnostic analysis of the expression data. Using the function expressed_regions() we can identify regions of expression based on a given data set in recount2. These regions might overlap known exons but can also provide information about intron retention events (Figure 11), improve detection of exon boundaries (Figure 12), and help identify new exons (Fig 1) or expressed sequences in intergenic regions. Using coverage_matrix() we can compute a coverage matrix based on the expressed regions or another set of genomic intervals. The resulting matrix can then be used for a DE analysis, just like the exon, gene and exon-exon junction matrices.
Figure 11: Intron retention events
Some reads might align with known intronic segments of the genome and provide information for exploring intron retention events (pink read). Some might support an intron retention event or a new isoform when coupled with exon-exon junction data (orange read).
Figure 12: Exon boundaries
Reads that go beyond the known exon boundaries can inform us of whether the annotated boundaries are correct or if there was a run-off transcription event.
2.4 Gene-level analysis
Having reviewed how the coverage counts in recount2 were produced, we can now do a DE analysis. We will use data from 72 individuals spanning the human lifespan, split into 6 age groups with SRA accession SRP045638 (13). The function download_study() requires a SRA accession which can be found using abstract_search(). download_study() can then be used to download the gene coverage count data as well as other expression features. The files are saved in a directory named after the SRA accession, in this case SRP045638.
library("recount")
## Find the project ID by searching abstracts of studies
abstract_search("human brain development by age")## number_samples species
## 1296 72 human
## abstract
## 1296 RNAseq data of 36 samples across human brain development by age group from LIBD
## project
## 1296 SRP045638## Download the data if it is not there
if(!file.exists(file.path("SRP045638", "rse_gene.Rdata"))) {
download_study("SRP045638", type = "rse-gene")
}## 2018-05-02 08:04:16 downloading file rse_gene.Rdata to SRP045638## Check that the file was downloaded
file.exists(file.path("SRP045638", "rse_gene.Rdata"))## [1] TRUE## Load the data
load(file.path("SRP045638", "rse_gene.Rdata"))The coverage count matrices are provided as RangedSummarizedExperiment objects (rse) (9). These objects store information at the feature level, the samples and the actual count matrix as shown in Figure 1 of Love et al., 2016 (3). Figure 2 shows the actual rse objects provided by recount2 and how to access the different portions of the data. Using a unique sample ID such as the SRA Run ID it is possible to expand the sample metadata. This can be done using the predicted phenotype provided by add_predictions() (14), pulling information from GEO via find_geo() and geo_characteristics(), or with custom code.
2.4.1 Metadata
Using the colData() function we can access sample metadata. More information on these metadata is provided in the supplementary material of the recount2 paper (7), and we provide a brief review here. The rse objects for SRA data sets include 21 columns with mostly technical information. The GTEx and TCGA rse objects include additional metadata as available from the raw sources. In particular, we compiled metadata for GTEx using the v6 phenotype information available at gtexportal.org, and we put together a large table of TCGA case and sample information by combining information accumulated across Seven Bridges’ Cancer Genomics Cloud and TCGAbiolinks (15).
## One row per sample, one column per phenotype variable
dim(colData(rse_gene))## [1] 72 21## Mostly technical variables are included
colnames(colData(rse_gene))## [1] "project"
## [2] "sample"
## [3] "experiment"
## [4] "run"
## [5] "read_count_as_reported_by_sra"
## [6] "reads_downloaded"
## [7] "proportion_of_reads_reported_by_sra_downloaded"
## [8] "paired_end"
## [9] "sra_misreported_paired_end"
## [10] "mapped_read_count"
## [11] "auc"
## [12] "sharq_beta_tissue"
## [13] "sharq_beta_cell_type"
## [14] "biosample_submission_date"
## [15] "biosample_publication_date"
## [16] "biosample_update_date"
## [17] "avg_read_length"
## [18] "geo_accession"
## [19] "bigwig_file"
## [20] "title"
## [21] "characteristics"2.4.1.1 Technical variables
Several of these technical variables include the number of reads as reported by SRA, the actual number of reads Rail-RNA was able to download (which might be lower in some cases), the number of reads mapped by Rail-RNA, whether the sample is paired-end or not, the coverage AUC and the average read length (times 2 for paired-end samples). Note that the sample with SRA Run ID SRR2071341 has about 240.8 million reads as reported by SRA, while it has 120.4 million spots reported in https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?run=SRR2071341; that is because it is a paired-end sample (2 reads per spot). These details are important for those interested in writing alternative scaling functions to scale_counts().
## Input reads: number reported by SRA might be larger than number
## of reads Rail-RNA downloaded
colData(rse_gene)[,
c("read_count_as_reported_by_sra", "reads_downloaded")]## DataFrame with 72 rows and 2 columns
## read_count_as_reported_by_sra reads_downloaded
## <integer> <integer>
## SRR2071341 240797206 240797206
## SRR2071345 82266652 82266652
## SRR2071346 132911310 132911310
## SRR2071347 74051302 74051302
## SRR2071348 250259914 250259914
## ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 186250218 162403466
## SRR1554554 140038024 121793680
## SRR1554535 106244496 91185969
## SRR1554558 200687480 170754145
## SRR1554553 90579486 51803404summary(
colData(rse_gene)$proportion_of_reads_reported_by_sra_downloaded
)## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 0.5719 0.9165 0.9788 0.9532 1.0000 1.0000## AUC information used by scale_counts() by default
head(colData(rse_gene)$auc)## [1] 22950214241 7553726235 12018044330 7041243857 24062460144 45169026301## Alternatively, scale_scounts() can use the number of mapped reads
## and other information
colData(rse_gene)[, c("mapped_read_count", "paired_end",
"avg_read_length")]## DataFrame with 72 rows and 3 columns
## mapped_read_count paired_end avg_read_length
## <integer> <logical> <integer>
## SRR2071341 232970536 TRUE 200
## SRR2071345 78431778 TRUE 200
## SRR2071346 124493632 TRUE 200
## SRR2071347 71742875 TRUE 200
## SRR2071348 242992735 TRUE 200
## ... ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 162329325 TRUE 174
## SRR1554554 121738246 TRUE 173
## SRR1554535 91120421 TRUE 171
## SRR1554558 170648458 TRUE 170
## SRR1554553 51684462 TRUE 1142.4.1.2 Biological information
Other metadata variables included provide more biological information, such as the SHARQ beta tissue and cell type predictions, which are based on processing the abstract of papers. This information is available for some of the SRA projects.
## SHARQ tissue predictions: not present for all studies
head(colData(rse_gene)$sharq_beta_tissue)## [1] NA NA NA NA NA NAhead(colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$sharq_beta_tissue)## [1] "blood" "blood" "blood" "blood" "blood" "blood"For some data sets we were able to find the GEO accession IDs, which we then used to create the title and characteristics variables. If present, the characteristics information can be used to create additional metadata variables by parsing the CharacterList in which it is stored. Since the input is free text, sometimes more than one type of wording is used to describe the same information, meaning that we might have to process that information in order to build a more convenient variable, such as a factor vector.
## GEO information was absent for the SRP045638 data set
colData(rse_gene)[, c("geo_accession", "title", "characteristics")]## DataFrame with 72 rows and 3 columns
## geo_accession title characteristics
## <character> <character> <CharacterList>
## SRR2071341 NA NA NA
## SRR2071345 NA NA NA
## SRR2071346 NA NA NA
## SRR2071347 NA NA NA
## SRR2071348 NA NA NA
## ... ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 NA NA NA
## SRR1554554 NA NA NA
## SRR1554535 NA NA NA
## SRR1554558 NA NA NA
## SRR1554553 NA NA NA## GEO information for the SRP009615 data set
head(colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$geo_accession)## [1] "GSM836270" "GSM836271" "GSM836272" "GSM836273" "GSM847561" "GSM847562"head(colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$title, 2)## [1] "K562 cells with shRNA targeting SRF gene cultured with no doxycycline (uninduced - UI), rep1."
## [2] "K562 cells with shRNA targeting SRF gene cultured with doxycycline for 48 hours (48 hr), rep1."head(colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$characteristics, 2)## CharacterList of length 2
## [[1]] cells: K562 shRNA expression: no treatment: Puromycin
## [[2]] cells: K562 shRNA expression: yes, targeting SRF treatment: Puromycin, doxycycline## Similar but not exactly the same wording used for two different samples
colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$characteristics[[1]]## [1] "cells: K562" "shRNA expression: no" "treatment: Puromycin"colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$characteristics[[11]]## [1] "cell line: K562"
## [2] "shRNA expression: no shRNA expression"
## [3] "treatment: Puromycin"## Extract the target information
target <- sapply(colData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$characteristics, "[", 2)
target## [1] "shRNA expression: no"
## [2] "shRNA expression: yes, targeting SRF"
## [3] "shRNA expression: no"
## [4] "shRNA expression: yes targeting SRF"
## [5] "shRNA expression: no shRNA expression"
## [6] "shRNA expression: expressing shRNA targeting EGR1"
## [7] "shRNA expression: no shRNA expression"
## [8] "shRNA expression: expressing shRNA targeting EGR1"
## [9] "shRNA expression: no shRNA expression"
## [10] "shRNA expression: expressing shRNA targeting ATF3"
## [11] "shRNA expression: no shRNA expression"
## [12] "shRNA expression: expressing shRNA targeting ATF3"## Build a useful factor vector, set the reference level and append the result
## to the colData() slot
target_factor <- sapply(strsplit(target, "targeting "), "[", 2)
target_factor[is.na(target_factor)] <- "none"
target_factor <- factor(target_factor)
target_factor <- relevel(target_factor, "none")
target_factor## [1] none SRF none SRF none EGR1 none EGR1 none ATF3 none ATF3
## Levels: none ATF3 EGR1 SRFcolData(rse_gene_SRP009615)$target_factor <- target_factorAs shown in Figure 2, we can expand the biological metadata information by adding predictions based on RNA-seq data (14). The predictions include information about sex, sample source (cell line vs tissue), tissue and the sequencing strategy used. To add the predictions, simply use the function add_predictions() to expand the colData() slot.
## Before adding predictions
dim(colData(rse_gene))## [1] 72 21## Add the predictions
rse_gene <- add_predictions(rse_gene)## 2018-05-02 08:04:18 downloading the predictions to /tmp/RtmpvvGCD7/PredictedPhenotypes_v0.0.06.rda## Loading objects:
## PredictedPhenotypes## After adding the predictions
dim(colData(rse_gene))## [1] 72 33## Explore the variables
colData(rse_gene)[, 22:ncol(colData(rse_gene))]## DataFrame with 72 rows and 12 columns
## reported_sex predicted_sex accuracy_sex
## <factor> <factor> <numeric>
## SRR2071341 female female 0.862637362637363
## SRR2071345 male male 0.862637362637363
## SRR2071346 male male 0.862637362637363
## SRR2071347 female female 0.862637362637363
## SRR2071348 female female 0.862637362637363
## ... ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 male male 0.862637362637363
## SRR1554554 female female 0.862637362637363
## SRR1554535 male male 0.862637362637363
## SRR1554558 female female 0.862637362637363
## SRR1554553 male male 0.862637362637363
## reported_samplesource predicted_samplesource
## <factor> <factor>
## SRR2071341 NA tissue
## SRR2071345 NA tissue
## SRR2071346 NA tissue
## SRR2071347 NA tissue
## SRR2071348 NA tissue
## ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 NA tissue
## SRR1554554 NA tissue
## SRR1554535 NA tissue
## SRR1554558 NA tissue
## SRR1554553 NA tissue
## accuracy_samplesource reported_tissue predicted_tissue
## <numeric> <factor> <factor>
## SRR2071341 NA NA Brain
## SRR2071345 0.892349726775956 NA Brain
## SRR2071346 NA NA Brain
## SRR2071347 NA NA Brain
## SRR2071348 NA NA Brain
## ... ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 NA NA Brain
## SRR1554554 NA NA Brain
## SRR1554535 NA NA Brain
## SRR1554558 NA NA Brain
## SRR1554553 0.892349726775956 NA Brain
## accuracy_tissue reported_sequencingstrategy
## <numeric> <factor>
## SRR2071341 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR2071345 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR2071346 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR2071347 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR2071348 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR1554554 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR1554535 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR1554558 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## SRR1554553 0.518824712322645 PAIRED
## predicted_sequencingstrategy accuracy_sequencingstrategy
## <factor> <numeric>
## SRR2071341 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR2071345 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR2071346 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR2071347 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR2071348 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR1554554 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR1554535 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR1554558 PAIRED 0.908574650610174
## SRR1554553 PAIRED 0.9085746506101742.4.1.3 Adding more information
Ultimately, more sample metadata information could be available elsewhere, which can be useful for analyses. This information might be provided in the paper describing the data, the SRA Run Selector or other sources. As shown in Figure 2, it is possible to append information to the colData() slot as long as there is a unique sample identifier such as the SRA Run ID.
For our example use case, project SRP045638 has a few extra biologically relevant variables via the SRA Run selector https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=SRP045638. We can download that information into text file named SraRunTable.txt by default, then load it into R, sort it appropriately and then append it to the colData() slot. Below we do so for the SRP045638 project.
## Save the information from
## https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=SRP045638
## to a table. We saved the file as SRP045638/SraRunTable.txt.
file.exists(file.path("SRP045638", "SraRunTable.txt"))## [1] TRUE## Read the table
sra <- read.table(file.path("SRP045638", "SraRunTable.txt"),
header = TRUE, sep = "\t")
## Explore it
head(sra)## AssemblyName_s AvgSpotLen_l BioSample_s Experiment_s
## 1 GRCh37 179 SAMN02731372 SRX683791
## 2 GRCh37 179 SAMN02731373 SRX683792
## 3 GRCh37 171 SAMN02999518 SRX683793
## 4 GRCh37 184 SAMN02999519 SRX683794
## 5 GRCh37 182 SAMN02999520 SRX683795
## 6 GRCh37 185 SAMN02999521 SRX683796
## Library_Name_s LoadDate_s MBases_l MBytes_l RIN_s
## 1 R2835_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 6452 3571 8.3
## 2 R2857_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 6062 2879 8.4
## 3 R2869_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 8696 4963 8.7
## 4 R3098_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 4479 2643 5.3
## 5 R3452_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 11634 6185 9.6
## 6 R3462_DLPFC_polyA_RNAseq_total 2014-08-21 14050 7157 6.4
## ReleaseDate_s Run_s SRA_Sample_s Sample_Name_s age_s disease_s
## 1 2014-11-13 SRR1554533 SRS686961 R2835_DLPFC 67.7800 Control
## 2 2014-11-13 SRR1554534 SRS686962 R2857_DLPFC 40.4200 Control
## 3 2014-11-13 SRR1554535 SRS686963 R2869_DLPFC 41.5800 control
## 4 2014-11-13 SRR1554536 SRS686964 R3098_DLPFC 44.1700 control
## 5 2014-11-13 SRR1554537 SRS686965 R3452_DLPFC -0.3836 control
## 6 2014-11-13 SRR1554538 SRS686966 R3462_DLPFC -0.4027 control
## isolate_s race_s sex_s Assay_Type_s BioProject_s BioSampleModel_s
## 1 DLPFC AA female RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## 2 DLPFC AA male RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## 3 R2869 AA male RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## 4 R3098 AA female RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## 5 R3452 AA female RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## 6 R3462 AA female RNA-Seq PRJNA245228 Human
## Consent_s Fraction_s InsertSize_l Instrument_s LibraryLayout_s
## 1 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## 2 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## 3 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## 4 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## 5 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## 6 public total 0 Illumina HiSeq 2000 PAIRED
## LibrarySelection_s LibrarySource_s Organism_s Platform_s SRA_Study_s
## 1 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## 2 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## 3 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## 4 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## 5 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## 6 cDNA TRANSCRIPTOMIC Homo sapiens ILLUMINA SRP045638
## biomaterial_provider_s tissue_s
## 1 LIBD DLPFC
## 2 LIBD DLPFC
## 3 LIBD DLPFC
## 4 LIBD DLPFC
## 5 LIBD DLPFC
## 6 LIBD DLPFC## We will remove some trailing '_s' from the variable names
colnames(sra) <- gsub("_s$", "", colnames(sra))
## Choose some variables we want to add
sra_vars <- c("sex", "race", "RIN", "age", "isolate", "disease",
"tissue")
## Re-organize the SRA table based on the SRA Run IDs we have
sra <- sra[match(colData(rse_gene)$run, sra$Run), ]
## Double check the order
identical(colData(rse_gene)$run, as.character(sra$Run))## [1] TRUE## Append the variables of interest
colData(rse_gene) <- cbind(colData(rse_gene), sra[, sra_vars])
## Final dimensions
dim(colData(rse_gene))## [1] 72 40## Explore result
colData(rse_gene)[, 34:ncol(colData(rse_gene))]## DataFrame with 72 rows and 7 columns
## sex race RIN age isolate disease tissue
## <factor> <factor> <numeric> <numeric> <factor> <factor> <factor>
## SRR2071341 female AA 8.3 67.78 DLPFC Control DLPFC
## SRR2071345 male AA 8.4 40.42 DLPFC Control DLPFC
## SRR2071346 male AA 8.7 41.58 R2869 control DLPFC
## SRR2071347 female AA 5.3 44.17 R3098 control DLPFC
## SRR2071348 female AA 9.6 -0.3836 R3452 control DLPFC
## ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
## SRR1554541 male AA 5.7 -0.3836 R3485 control DLPFC
## SRR1554554 female AA 8.1 0.3041 R3669 control DLPFC
## SRR1554535 male AA 8.7 41.58 R2869 control DLPFC
## SRR1554558 female CAUC 9.1 16.7 R4028 control DLPFC
## SRR1554553 male CAUC 8.4 0.3918 R3652 control DLPFCSince we have the predicted sex as well as the reported sex via the SRA Run Selector, we can check whether they match.
table("Predicted" = colData(rse_gene)$predicted_sex,
"Observed" = colData(rse_gene)$sex)## Observed
## Predicted female male
## female 24 4
## male 0 44
## Unassigned 0 02.4.2 DE setup
Now that we have all the metadata available we can perform a DE analysis. The original study for project SRP045638 (13) looked at differences between 6 age groups: prenatal, infant, child, teen, adult and late life. The following code creates these six age groups.
## Create the original 6 age groups
age_bins <- cut( colData(rse_gene)$age, c(-1, 0, 1, 10, 20, 50, Inf),
include.lowest=TRUE )
levels( age_bins ) <- c("prenatal", "infant", "child", "teen", "adult",
"late life")
colData(rse_gene)$age_group <- age_binsMost of the DE signal from the original study was between the prenatal and postnatal samples. To simplify the analysis, we will focus on this comparison.
## Create prenatal factor
colData(rse_gene)$prenatal <- factor(
ifelse(colData(rse_gene)$age_group == "prenatal", "prenatal",
"postnatal"),
levels = c("prenatal", "postnatal"))As we saw earlier in Figure 9, it is important to scale the coverage counts to read counts. To highlight the fact that we scaled the counts, we will use a new object name and delete the previous one. However, in practice we would simply overwrite the rse object with the output of scale_counts(rse).
## Scale counts
rse_gene_scaled <- scale_counts(rse_gene)
## To highlight that we scaled the counts
rm(rse_gene)Having scaled the counts, we then filter out genes that are lowly expressed and extract the count matrix.
## Extract counts and filter out lowly expressed geens
counts <- assays(rse_gene_scaled)$counts
filter <- rowMeans(counts) > 0.52.4.3 DE analysis
Now that we have scaled the counts, there are multiple DE packages we could use, as described elsewhere (2,3). Since we have 12 samples per group, which is a moderate number, we will use limma-voom (16) due to its speed. The model we use tests for DE between prenatal and postnatal samples adjusting for sex and RIN, which is a measure of quality of the input sample. We check the data with multi-dimensional scaling plots (Figures 13 and 14) as well as the mean-variance plot (Figure 15). In a real use case we might have to explore the results with different models and perform sensitivity analyses.
library("limma")
library("edgeR")
## Build DGEList object
dge <- DGEList(counts = counts[filter, ])
## Calculate normalization factors
dge <- calcNormFactors(dge)
## Explore the data
plotMDS(dge, labels = substr(colData(rse_gene_scaled)$prenatal, 1, 2) )
Figure 13: Multi-dimensional scaling plot of the gene-level data by age group
plotMDS(dge, labels = substr(colData(rse_gene_scaled)$sex, 1, 1) )
Figure 14: Multi-dimensional scaling plot of the gene-level data by sex
tapply(colData(rse_gene_scaled)$RIN, colData(rse_gene_scaled)$prenatal,
summary)## $prenatal
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 5.700 6.400 8.150 7.767 8.600 9.600
##
## $postnatal
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 5.300 8.100 8.300 8.197 8.700 9.100## Specify our design matrix
design <- with(colData(rse_gene_scaled),
model.matrix(~ sex + RIN + prenatal))## Run voom
v <- voom(dge, design, plot = TRUE)
Figure 15: voom mean-variance plot of the gene-level data
## Run remaining parts of the DE analysis
fit <- lmFit(v, design)
fit <- eBayes(fit)Having run the DE analysis, we can explore some of the top results either with an MA plot (Figure 16) and a volcano plot Figure (17). Both reveal very strong and widespread DE signal.
## Visually explore DE results
limma::plotMA(fit, coef = 4)
Figure 16: MA plot of the gene-level data
Testing for prenatal and postnatal DE adjusting for sex and RIN.
limma::volcanoplot(fit, coef = 4)
Figure 17: Volcano plot of the gene-level data
Testing for prenatal and postnatal DE adjusting for sex and RIN.
2.4.4 DE report
Now that we have the DE results, we can use some of the tools with the biocView ReportWriting to create a report. One of them is regionReport (17), which can create reports from DESeq2 (18) and edgeR (19) results. It can also handle limma-voom (16) results by making them look like DESeq2 results. To do so, we need to extract the relevant information from the limma-voom objects using topTable() and build DESeqDataSet and DESeqResults objects as shown below. A similar conversion is needed to use ideal (20), which is another package in the ReportWriting biocView category.
## Extract data from limma-voom results
top <- topTable(fit, number = Inf, sort.by = "none",
coef = "prenatalpostnatal")
## Build a DESeqDataSet with the count data and model we used
library("DESeq2")
dds <- DESeqDataSet(rse_gene_scaled[filter, ], ~ sex + RIN + prenatal)## converting counts to integer mode## Add gene names keeping only the Ensembl part of the Gencode IDs
rownames(dds) <- gsub("\\..*", "", rownames(dds))
## Build a DESeqResults object with the relevant information
## Note that we are transforming the baseMean so it will look ok
## with DESeq2's plotting functions.
limma_res <- DESeqResults(DataFrame(pvalue = top[, "P.Value"],
log2FoldChange = top[, "logFC"],
baseMean = exp(top[, "AveExpr"]),
padj = top[, "adj.P.Val"]))
rownames(limma_res) <- rownames(dds)
## Specify FDR cutoff to use
metadata(limma_res)[["alpha"]] <- 0.001
## Add gene symbols so they will be displayed in the report
limma_res$symbol <- rowRanges(rse_gene_scaled)$symbol[filter]
## Some extra information used by the report function
mcols(dds) <- limma_res
mcols(mcols(dds)) <- DataFrame(type = "results",
description = "manual incomplete conversion from limma-voom to DESeq2")Having converted our limma-voom results to DESeq2 results, we can now create the report, which should open automatically in a browser.
library("regionReport")
## This takes about 20 minutes to run
report <- DESeq2Report(dds,
project = "SRP045638 gene results with limma-voom",
output = "gene_report", outdir = "SRP045638",
intgroup = c("prenatal", "sex"), res = limma_res,
software = "limma")If the report doesn’t open automatically, we can open it with browseURL(). A pre-computed version is available as Supplementary File 1.
browseURL(file.path("SRP045638", "gene_report.html"))2.4.5 GO enrichment
Using clusterProfiler (21) we can then perform several enrichment analyses using the Ensembl gene IDs. Here we show how to perform an enrichment analysis using the biological process ontology (Figure 18).
library("clusterProfiler")
library("org.Hs.eg.db")
## Remember that limma_res had ENSEMBL IDs for the genes
head(rownames(limma_res))## [1] "ENSG00000000003" "ENSG00000000005" "ENSG00000000419" "ENSG00000000457"
## [5] "ENSG00000000460" "ENSG00000000938"## Perform enrichment analysis for Biological Process (BP)
## Note that the argument is keytype instead of keyType in Bioconductor 3.5
enrich_go <- enrichGO(
gene = rownames(limma_res)[limma_res$padj < 0.001],
OrgDb = org.Hs.eg.db, keyType = "ENSEMBL", ont = "BP",
pAdjustMethod = "BH", pvalueCutoff = 0.01, qvalueCutoff = 0.05,
universe = rownames(limma_res))
## Visualize enrichment results
dotplot(enrich_go, font.size = 7)
Figure 18: Biological processes enriched in the DE genes
Several other analyses can be performed with the resulting list of differentially expressed genes as described previously (2,3), although that is beyond the scope of this workflow.
2.5 Other features
As described in Figure 1, recount2 provides data for expression features beyond genes. In this section we perform a DE analysis using exon data as well as the base-pair resolution information.
2.5.1 Exon and exon-exon junctions
The exon and exon-exon junction coverage count matrices are similar to the gene-level one and can also be downloaded with download_study(). However, these coverage count matrices are much larger than the gene one. Aggressive filtering of lowly expressed exons or exon-exon junctions can reduce the matrix dimensions if this impacts the performance of the DE software used.
Below we repeat the gene-level analysis for the disjoint exon data. We first download the exon data, add the expanded metadata we constructed for the gene analysis, explore the data (Figure1 19), and then perform the DE analysis using limma-voom.
## Download the data if it is not there
if(!file.exists(file.path("SRP045638", "rse_exon.Rdata"))) {
download_study("SRP045638", type = "rse-exon")
}## 2018-05-02 08:06:44 downloading file rse_exon.Rdata to SRP045638## Load the data
load(file.path("SRP045638", "rse_exon.Rdata"))
## Scale and add the metadata (it is in the same order)
identical(colData(rse_exon)$run, colData(rse_gene_scaled)$run)## [1] TRUEcolData(rse_exon) <- colData(rse_gene_scaled)
rse_exon_scaled <- scale_counts(rse_exon)
## To highlight that we scaled the counts
rm(rse_exon)
## Filter lowly expressed exons
filter_exon <- rowMeans(assays(rse_exon_scaled)$counts) > 0.5
round(table(filter_exon) / length(filter_exon) * 100, 2)## filter_exon
## FALSE TRUE
## 32.76 67.24## Build DGEList object
dge_exon <- DGEList(
counts = assays(rse_exon_scaled)$counts[filter_exon, ])
## Calculate normalization factors
dge_exon <- calcNormFactors(dge_exon)
## Run voom
v_exon <- voom(dge_exon, design, plot = TRUE)
Figure 19: voom mean-variance plot of the exon-level data
## Run remaining parts of the DE analysis
fit_exon <- lmFit(v_exon, design)
fit_exon <- eBayes(fit_exon)
## Visualize inspect results
limma::volcanoplot(fit_exon, coef = 4)
Figure 20: Volcano plot of the exon-level data
Testing for prenatal and postnatal DE adjusting for sex and RIN.
## Get p-values and other statistics
top_exon <- topTable(fit_exon, number = Inf, sort.by = "none",
coef = "prenatalpostnatal")
table(top_exon$adj.P.Val < 0.001)##
## FALSE TRUE
## 192061 213482Just like at the gene-level, we see many exons differentially expressed between prenatal and postnatal samples (Figure 20). As a first step to integrate the results from the two features, we can compare the list of genes that are differentially expressed versus the genes that have at least one exon differentially expressed.
## Get the gene IDs for genes that are DE at the gene-level or that have at
## least one exon with DE signal.
genes_w_de_exon <- unique(
rownames(rse_exon_scaled)[top_exon$adj.P.Val < 0.001])
genes_de <- rownames(rse_gene_scaled)[
which(filter)[top$adj.P.Val < 0.001]]
## Make a venn diagram
library("gplots")
vinfo <- venn(list("genes" = genes_de, "exons" = genes_w_de_exon),
names = c("genes", "exons"), show.plot = FALSE)
plot(vinfo) +
title("Genes/exons with DE signal")
Figure 21: Venn diagram of the overlap between DE genes and genes with at least one exon DE
## integer(0)Not all differentially expressed genes have differentially expressed exons. Moreover, genes with at least one differentially expressed exon are not necessarily differentially expressed, as shown in Figure 21. This is in line with what was described in Figure 2B of Soneson et al., 2015 (22).
This was just a quick example of how we can perform DE analyses at the gene and exon feature levels. We envision that more involved pipelines could be developed that leverage both feature levels, such as in Jaffe et al., 2017 (23). For instance, we could focus on the differentially expressed genes with at least one differentially expressed exon, and compare the direction of the DE signal versus the gene-level signal as shown in figure 22.
## Keep only the DE exons that are from a gene that is also DE
top_exon_de <- top_exon[top_exon$adj.P.Val < 0.001 &
top_exon$ID %in% attr(vinfo, "intersections")[["genes:exons"]], ]
## Find the fold change that is the most extreme among the DE exons of a gene
exon_max_fc <- tapply(top_exon_de$logFC, top_exon_de$ID, function(x) {
x[which.max(abs(x))] })
## Keep only the DE genes that match the previous selection
top_gene_de <- top[match(names(exon_max_fc), rownames(top)), ]
## Make the plot
plot(top_gene_de$logFC, exon_max_fc, pch = 20, col = adjustcolor("black", 1/5),
ylab = "Most extreme exon log FC",
xlab = "Gene log FC",
main = "DE genes with at least one DE exon")
abline(a = 0, b = 1, col = "red")
abline(h = 0, col = "grey80")
abline(v = 0, col = "grey80")
Figure 22: Log fold change (FC) for DE genes compared against the most extreme exon log FC among exons that are DE for the given gene
The fold change for most exons shown in Figure 22 agrees with the gene-level fold change. However, some of them have opposite directions and could be interesting to study further.
2.5.2 Base-pair resolution
recount2 provides bigWig coverage files (unscaled) for all samples, as well as a mean bigWig coverage file per project where each sample was scaled to 40 million 100 base-pair reads. The mean bigWig files are exactly what is needed to start an expressed regions analysis with derfinder (8). recount provides two related functions: expressed_regions() which is used to define a set of regions based on the mean bigWig file for a given project, and coverage_matrix() which based on a set of regions builds a count coverage matrix in a RangedSummarizedExperiment object just like the ones that are provided for genes and exons. Both functions ultimately use import.bw() from rtracklayer (24) which currently is not supported on Windows machines. While this presents a portability disadvantage, on the other side it allows reading portions of bigWig files from the web without having to fully download them. download_study() with type = "mean" or type = "samples" can be used to download the bigWig files, which we recommend doing when working with them extensively.
For illustrative purposes, we will use the data from chromosome 21 for the SRP045638 project. First, we obtain the expressed regions using a relatively high mean cutoff of 5. We then filter the regions to keep only the ones longer than 100 base-pairs to shorten the time needed for running coverage_matrix().
## Define expressed regions for study SRP045638, only for chromosome 21
regions <- expressed_regions("SRP045638", "chr21", cutoff = 5L,
maxClusterGap = 3000L)## 2018-05-02 08:09:02 loadCoverage: loading BigWig file http://duffel.rail.bio/recount/SRP045638/bw/mean_SRP045638.bw## 2018-05-02 08:09:18 loadCoverage: applying the cutoff to the merged data## 2018-05-02 08:09:40 filterData: originally there were 46709983 rows, now there are 46709983 rows. Meaning that 0 percent was filtered.## 2018-05-02 08:09:40 findRegions: identifying potential segments## 2018-05-02 08:09:40 findRegions: segmenting information## 2018-05-02 08:09:40 .getSegmentsRle: segmenting with cutoff(s) 5## 2018-05-02 08:09:44 findRegions: identifying candidate regions## 2018-05-02 08:09:44 findRegions: identifying region clusters## Explore the resulting expressed regions
regions## GRanges object with 3853 ranges and 6 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric>
## 1 chr21 5026549-5026630 * | 6.48181250037217 531.508625030518
## 2 chr21 5027935-5027961 * | 6.19690331706294 167.316389560699
## 3 chr21 5028108-5028225 * | 8.99329216197386 1061.20847511292
## 4 chr21 5032053-5032117 * | 7.06828071887676 459.43824672699
## 5 chr21 5032148-5032217 * | 6.48832686969212 454.182880878448
## ... ... ... ... . ... ...
## 3849 chr21 46695774 * | 5.0290150642395 5.0290150642395
## 3850 chr21 46695784-46695843 * | 5.38047295411428 322.828377246857
## 3851 chr21 46695865-46695869 * | 5.1128270149231 25.5641350746155
## 3852 chr21 46696463-46696486 * | 5.25689166784286 126.165400028229
## 3853 chr21 46696508-46696534 * | 5.22988386507387 141.206864356995
## indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL
## <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle>
## 1 5026549 5026630 1 1677
## 2 5027935 5027961 1 1677
## 3 5028108 5028225 1 1677
## 4 5032053 5032117 2 8283
## 5 5032148 5032217 2 8283
## ... ... ... ... ...
## 3849 46695774 46695774 708 5708
## 3850 46695784 46695843 708 5708
## 3851 46695865 46695869 708 5708
## 3852 46696463 46696486 708 5708
## 3853 46696508 46696534 708 5708
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genomesummary(width(regions))## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 1.0 6.0 68.0 186.2 151.0 11709.0table(width(regions) >= 100)##
## FALSE TRUE
## 2284 1569## Keep only the ones that are at least 100 bp long
regions <- regions[width(regions) >= 100]
length(regions)## [1] 1569Now that we have a set of regions to work with, we proceed to build a RangedSummarizedExperiment object with the coverage counts, add the expanded metadata we built for the gene-level, and scale the counts. Note that coverage_matrix() scales the base-pair coverage counts by default, which we turn off in order to use use scale_counts().
## Compute coverage matrix for study SRP045638, only for chromosome 21
## Takes about 4 minutes
rse_er <- coverage_matrix("SRP045638", "chr21", regions,
chunksize = 2000, verboseLoad = FALSE, scale = FALSE)## 2018-05-02 08:09:46 railMatrix: processing regions 1 to 1569## Use the expanded metadata we built for the gene model
colData(rse_er) <- colData(rse_gene_scaled)
## Scale the coverage matrix
rse_er_scaled <- scale_counts(rse_er)
## To highlight that we scaled the counts
rm(rse_er)Now that we have a scaled count matrix for the expressed regions, we can proceed with the DE analysis just like we did at the gene and exon feature levels (Figures 23, 24, 25, and 26).
## Build DGEList object
dge_er <- DGEList(counts = assays(rse_er_scaled)$counts)
## Calculate normalization factors
dge_er <- calcNormFactors(dge_er)
## Explore the data
plotMDS(dge_er, labels = substr(colData(rse_er_scaled)$prenatal, 1, 2) )
Figure 23: Multi-dimensional scaling plot of the expressed regions level data by age group
plotMDS(dge_er, labels = substr(colData(rse_er_scaled)$sex, 1, 1) )
Figure 24: Multi-dimensional scaling plot of the expressed regions level data by sex
## Run voom
v_er <- voom(dge_er, design, plot = TRUE)
Figure 25: voom mean-variance plot of the expressed regions level data
## Run remaining parts of the DE analysis
fit_er <- lmFit(v_er, design)
fit_er <- eBayes(fit_er)## Visually explore the results
limma::volcanoplot(fit_er, coef = 4)
Figure 26: Volcano plot of the expressed regions level data
Testing for prenatal and postnatal DE adjusting for sex and RIN.
## Number of DERs
top_er <- topTable(fit_er, number = Inf, sort.by = "none",
coef = "prenatalpostnatal")
table(top_er$adj.P.Val < 0.001)##
## FALSE TRUE
## 609 960Having identified the differentially expressed regions (DERs), we can sort all regions by their adjusted p-value.
## Sort regions by q-value
regions_by_padj <- regions[order(top_er$adj.P.Val, decreasing = FALSE)]
## Look at the top 10
regions_by_padj[1:10]## GRanges object with 10 ranges and 6 metadata columns:
## seqnames ranges strand | value area
## <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <numeric> <numeric>
## 2998 chr21 44441692-44442678 * | 34.7397774041243 34288.1602978706
## 2144 chr21 38822674-38824916 * | 85.5637880753472 191919.576653004
## 3033 chr21 44458772-44459070 * | 8.44090369872026 2523.83020591736
## 3029 chr21 44458526-44458644 * | 5.80783885667304 691.132823944092
## 3505 chr21 46250498-46250780 * | 5.68433203882548 1608.66596698761
## 3045 chr21 44461331-44461480 * | 5.82021920522054 873.032880783081
## 1356 chr21 33070821-33072413 * | 190.209820540836 303004.244121552
## 1714 chr21 36225565-36225667 * | 11.5645264560737 1191.14622497559
## 3773 chr21 46598568-46599629 * | 301.859495409015 320574.784124374
## 2254 chr21 39928983-39929390 * | 233.013994795435 95069.7098765373
## indexStart indexEnd cluster clusterL
## <integer> <integer> <Rle> <Rle>
## 2998 44441692 44442678 607 14072
## 2144 38822674 38824916 435 14882
## 3033 44458772 44459070 608 4968
## 3029 44458526 44458644 608 4968
## 3505 46250498 46250780 678 30649
## 3045 44461331 44461480 608 4968
## 1356 33070821 33072413 292 2261
## 1714 36225565 36225667 375 9845
## 3773 46598568 46599629 704 6544
## 2254 39928983 39929390 464 3344
## -------
## seqinfo: 1 sequence from an unspecified genomewidth(regions_by_padj[1:10])## [1] 987 2243 299 119 283 150 1593 103 1062 4082.5.3 Visualize regions
Since the DERs do not necessarily match the annotation, it is important to visualize them. The code for visualizing DERs can easily be adapted to visualize other regions. Although, the width and number of the regions will influence the computing resources needed to make the plots.
Because the unscaled bigWig files are available in recount2, several visualization packages can be used such as epivizr (25), wiggleplotr (26) and derfinderPlot (8). With all of them it is important to remember to scale the data except when visualizing the mean bigWig file for a given project.
First, we need to get the list of URLs for the bigWig files. We can either manually construct them or search them inside the recount_url table.
## Construct the list of bigWig URLs
## They have the following form:
## http://duffel.rail.bio/recount/
## project id
## /bw/
## sample run id
## .bw
bws <- paste0("http://duffel.rail.bio/recount/SRP045638/bw/",
colData(rse_er_scaled)$bigwig_file)
## Note that they are also present in the recount_url data.frame
bws <- recount_url$url[match(colData(rse_er_scaled)$bigwig_file,
recount_url$file_name)]
## Use the sample run IDs as the sample names
names(bws) <- colData(rse_er_scaled)$runWe visualize the DERs using derfinderPlot, similar to what was done in the original publication (13). However, we first add a little padding to the regions: 100 base-pairs on each side.
## Add 100 bp padding on each side
regions_resized <- resize(regions_by_padj[1:10],
width(regions_by_padj[1:10]) + 200, fix = "center")Next, we obtain the base-pair coverage data for each DER and scale the data to a library size of 40 million 100 base-pair reads, using the coverage AUC information we have in the metadata.
## Get the bp coverage data for the plots
library("derfinder")
regionCov <- getRegionCoverage(regions = regions_resized, files = bws,
targetSize = 40 * 1e6 * 100,
totalMapped = colData(rse_er_scaled)$auc,
verbose = FALSE)The function plotRegionCoverage() requires several pieces of annotation information for the plots that use a TxDb object. For recount2 we used Gencode v25 hg38’s annotation, which means that we need to process it manually instead of using a pre-computed TxDb package.
To create a TxDb object for Gencode v25, first we need to import the data. Since we are working only with chromosome 21 for this example, we can subset it. Next we need to add the relevant chromosome information. Some of the annotation functions we use can handle Entrez or Ensembl IDs, but not Gencode IDs. So we will make sure that we are working with Ensembl IDs before finally creating the Gencode v25 TxDb object.
## Import the Gencode v25 hg38 gene annotation
library("rtracklayer")
gencode_v25_hg38 <- import(paste0(
"ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/gencode/Gencode_human/release_25/",
"gencode.v25.annotation.gtf.gz"))
## Keep only the chr21 info
gencode_v25_hg38 <- keepSeqlevels(gencode_v25_hg38, "chr21",
pruning.mode = "coarse")
## Get the chromosome information for hg38
library("GenomicFeatures")
chrInfo <- getChromInfoFromUCSC("hg38")## Download and preprocess the 'chrominfo' data frame ... OKchrInfo$chrom <- as.character(chrInfo$chrom)
chrInfo <- chrInfo[chrInfo$chrom %in% seqlevels(regions), ]
chrInfo$isCircular <- FALSE
## Assign the chromosome information to the object we will use to
## create the txdb object
si <- with(chrInfo, Seqinfo(as.character(chrom), length, isCircular,
genome = "hg38"))
seqinfo(gencode_v25_hg38) <- si
## Switch from Gencode gene IDs to Ensembl gene IDs
gencode_v25_hg38$gene_id <- gsub("\\..*", "", gencode_v25_hg38$gene_id)
## Create the TxDb object
gencode_v25_hg38_txdb <- makeTxDbFromGRanges(gencode_v25_hg38)## Warning in .get_cds_IDX(type, phase): The "phase" metadata column contains non-NA values for features of
## type stop_codon. This information was ignored.## Explore the TxDb object
gencode_v25_hg38_txdb## TxDb object:
## # Db type: TxDb
## # Supporting package: GenomicFeatures
## # Genome: hg38
## # transcript_nrow: 2413
## # exon_nrow: 7670
## # cds_nrow: 2623
## # Db created by: GenomicFeatures package from Bioconductor
## # Creation time: 2018-05-02 08:18:06 -0400 (Wed, 02 May 2018)
## # GenomicFeatures version at creation time: 1.32.0
## # RSQLite version at creation time: 2.1.0
## # DBSCHEMAVERSION: 1.2Now that we have a TxDb object for Gencode v25 on hg38 coordinates, we can use bumphunter’s (27) annotation functions for annotating the original 10 regions we were working with. Since we are using Ensembl instead of Entrez gene IDs, we need to pass this information to annotateTranscripts(). Otherwise, the function will fail to retrieve the gene symbols.
library("bumphunter")
## Annotate all transcripts for gencode v25 based on the TxDb object
## we built previously.
ann_gencode_v25_hg38 <- annotateTranscripts(gencode_v25_hg38_txdb,
annotationPackage = "org.Hs.eg.db",
mappingInfo = list("column" = "ENTREZID", "keytype" = "ENSEMBL",
"multiVals" = "first"))## Getting TSS and TSE.## Getting CSS and CSE.## Getting exons.## Annotating genes.## 'select()' returned 1:many mapping between keys and columns## Annotate the regions of interest
## Note that we are using the original regions, not the resized ones
nearest_ann <- matchGenes(regions_by_padj[1:10], ann_gencode_v25_hg38)The final piece we need to run plotRegionCoverage() is information about which base-pairs are exonic, intronic, etc. This is done via the annotateRegions() function in derfinder, which itself requires prior processing of the TxDb information by makeGenomicState().
## Create the genomic state object using the gencode TxDb object
gs_gencode_v25_hg38 <- makeGenomicState(gencode_v25_hg38_txdb,
chrs = seqlevels(regions))## 'select()' returned 1:1 mapping between keys and columns## Annotate the original regions
regions_ann <- annotateRegions(regions_resized,
gs_gencode_v25_hg38$fullGenome)## 2018-05-02 08:18:32 annotateRegions: counting## 2018-05-02 08:18:33 annotateRegions: annotatingWe can finally use plotRegionCoverage() to visualize the top 10 regions coloring by whether they are prenatal or postnatal samples. Known exons are shown in dark blue, introns in light blue.
library("derfinderPlot")
pdf('region_plots.pdf')
plotRegionCoverage(regions = regions_resized, regionCoverage = regionCov,
groupInfo = colData(rse_er_scaled)$prenatal,
nearestAnnotation = nearest_ann,
annotatedRegions = regions_ann,
txdb = gencode_v25_hg38_txdb,
scalefac = 1, ylab = "Coverage (RP40M, 100bp)",
ask = FALSE, verbose = FALSE)
dev.off()## png
## 2## Visualize DER #2
plotRegionCoverage(regions = regions_resized, regionCoverage = regionCov,
groupInfo = colData(rse_er_scaled)$prenatal,
nearestAnnotation = nearest_ann,
annotatedRegions = regions_ann,
txdb = gencode_v25_hg38_txdb,
scalefac = 1, ylab = "Coverage (RP40M, 100bp)",
ask = FALSE, verbose = FALSE, whichRegions = 2)
Figure 27: Base-pair resolution plot of differentially expressed region 2
In plots like Figure 27 we can see that some DERs match known exons (DERs 2, 8, 10), some are longer than known exons (DERs 1, 7, 9), and others are exon fragments (DERs 3, 4, 5, 6) which could be due to the cutoff used. Note that DER 7 could be shorter than a known exon due to a coverage dip.
3 Summary
In this workflow we described in detail the available data in recount2, how the coverage count matrices were computed, the metadata included in recount2 and how to get new phenotypic information from other sources. We showed how to perform a DE analysis at the gene and exon levels as well as use an annotation-agnostic approach. Finally, we explained how to visualize the base-pair information for a given set of regions. This workflow constitutes a strong basis to leverage the recount2 data for human RNA-seq analyses.
4 Session information
This workflow was created using BiocWorkflowTools (28). The session information is available in Supplementary File 2. The most recent version of this workflow is available via Bioconductor at http://bioconductor.org/help/workflows/. The published version of this workflow (29) is available via F1000Research at f1000research.com/articles/6-1558/v1.
## Final list of files created
dir("SRP045638")## [1] "SraRunTable.txt" "rse_exon.Rdata" "rse_gene.Rdata"## Pandoc information
library("rmarkdown")##
## Attaching package: 'rmarkdown'## The following objects are masked from 'package:BiocStyle':
##
## html_document, md_document, pdf_documentpandoc_version()## [1] '2.1'## Time for reproducing this workflow, in minutes
round(proc.time()[3] / 60, 1)## elapsed
## 14.9options(width = 100)
library("devtools")
session_info()## Session info --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------## setting value
## version R version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
## system x86_64, linux-gnu
## ui X11
## language (EN)
## collate C
## tz America/New_York
## date 2018-05-02## Packages ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------## package * version date source
## acepack 1.4.1 2016-10-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## annotate 1.58.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## AnnotationDbi * 1.42.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## AnnotationFilter 1.4.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## assertthat 0.2.0 2017-04-11 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## backports 1.1.2 2017-12-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## base * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## base64enc 0.1-3 2015-07-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bibtex 0.4.2 2017-06-30 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bindr 0.1.1 2018-03-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bindrcpp 0.2.2 2018-03-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Biobase * 2.40.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## BiocGenerics * 0.26.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## BiocInstaller 1.30.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## BiocParallel * 1.14.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## BiocStyle * 2.8.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## biomaRt 2.36.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## Biostrings 2.48.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## biovizBase 1.28.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## bit 1.1-12 2014-04-09 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bit64 0.9-7 2017-05-08 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bitops 1.0-6 2013-08-17 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## blob 1.1.1 2018-03-25 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## bookdown 0.7 2018-02-18 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## BSgenome 1.48.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## bumphunter * 1.22.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## caTools 1.17.1 2014-09-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## checkmate 1.8.5 2017-10-24 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## cluster 2.0.7-1 2018-04-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## clusterProfiler * 3.8.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## codetools 0.2-15 2016-10-05 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## colorspace 1.3-2 2016-12-14 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## compiler 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## cowplot 0.9.2 2017-12-17 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## curl 3.2 2018-03-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## data.table 1.11.0 2018-05-01 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## datasets * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## DBI 0.8 2018-03-02 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## DEFormats 1.8.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## DelayedArray * 0.6.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## derfinder * 1.14.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## derfinderHelper 1.14.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## derfinderPlot * 1.14.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## DESeq2 * 1.20.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## devtools * 1.13.5 2018-02-18 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## dichromat 2.0-0 2013-01-24 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## digest 0.6.15 2018-01-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## DO.db 2.9 2018-04-27 Bioconductor
## doRNG 1.6.6 2017-04-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## DOSE 3.6.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## downloader 0.4 2015-07-09 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## dplyr 0.7.4 2017-09-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## edgeR * 3.22.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## enrichplot 1.0.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## ensembldb 2.4.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## evaluate 0.10.1 2017-06-24 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## fastmatch 1.1-0 2017-01-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## fgsea 1.6.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## foreach * 1.4.4 2017-12-12 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## foreign 0.8-70 2017-11-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Formula 1.2-2 2017-07-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## gdata 2.18.0 2017-06-06 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## genefilter 1.62.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## geneplotter 1.58.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GenomeInfoDb * 1.16.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GenomeInfoDbData 1.1.0 2018-04-27 Bioconductor
## GenomicAlignments 1.16.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GenomicFeatures * 1.32.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GenomicFiles 1.16.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GenomicRanges * 1.32.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GEOquery 2.48.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## GGally 1.3.2 2017-08-02 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ggbio 1.28.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## ggforce 0.1.1 2016-11-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ggplot2 2.2.1 2016-12-30 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ggraph 1.0.1 2018-01-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ggrepel 0.7.0 2017-09-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ggridges 0.5.0 2018-04-05 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## glue 1.2.0 2017-10-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## GO.db 3.6.0 2018-04-27 Bioconductor
## GOSemSim 2.6.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## gplots * 3.0.1 2016-03-30 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## graph 1.58.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## graphics * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## grDevices * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## grid 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## gridExtra 2.3 2017-09-09 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## gtable 0.2.0 2016-02-26 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## gtools 3.5.0 2015-05-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## highr 0.6 2016-05-09 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Hmisc 4.1-1 2018-01-03 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## hms 0.4.2 2018-03-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## htmlTable 1.11.2 2018-01-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## htmltools 0.3.6 2017-04-28 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## htmlwidgets 1.2 2018-04-19 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## httr 1.3.1 2017-08-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## igraph 1.2.1 2018-03-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## IRanges * 2.14.1 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## iterators * 1.0.9 2017-12-12 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## jsonlite 1.5 2017-06-01 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## KernSmooth 2.23-15 2015-06-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## knitcitations 1.0.8 2017-07-04 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## knitr 1.20 2018-02-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## knitrBootstrap 1.0.1 2017-07-19 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## labeling 0.3 2014-08-23 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## lattice 0.20-35 2017-03-25 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## latticeExtra 0.6-28 2016-02-09 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## lazyeval 0.2.1 2017-10-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## limma * 3.36.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## locfit * 1.5-9.1 2013-04-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## lubridate 1.7.4 2018-04-11 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## magrittr 1.5 2014-11-22 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## markdown 0.8 2017-04-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## MASS 7.3-50 2018-04-30 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Matrix 1.2-14 2018-04-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## matrixStats * 0.53.1 2018-02-11 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## memoise 1.1.0 2017-04-21 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## methods * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## munsell 0.4.3 2016-02-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## nnet 7.3-12 2016-02-02 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## org.Hs.eg.db * 3.6.0 2018-04-27 Bioconductor
## OrganismDbi 1.22.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## parallel * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## pillar 1.2.2 2018-04-26 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## pkgconfig 2.0.1 2017-03-21 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## pkgmaker 0.22 2014-05-14 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## plyr 1.8.4 2016-06-08 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## prettyunits 1.0.2 2015-07-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## progress 1.1.2 2016-12-14 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## ProtGenerics 1.12.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## purrr 0.2.4 2017-10-18 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## qvalue 2.12.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## R6 2.2.2 2017-06-17 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## RBGL 1.56.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## RColorBrewer 1.1-2 2014-12-07 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Rcpp 0.12.16 2018-03-13 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## RCurl 1.95-4.10 2018-01-04 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## readr 1.1.1 2017-05-16 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## recount * 1.6.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## RefManageR 1.2.0 2018-04-25 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## regionReport * 1.14.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## registry 0.5 2017-12-03 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rentrez 1.2.1 2018-03-05 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## reshape 0.8.7 2017-08-06 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## reshape2 1.4.3 2017-12-11 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rlang 0.2.0 2018-02-20 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rmarkdown * 1.9 2018-03-01 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rngtools 1.2.4 2014-03-06 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rpart 4.1-13 2018-02-23 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rprojroot 1.3-2 2018-01-03 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## Rsamtools 1.32.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## RSQLite 2.1.0 2018-03-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rstudioapi 0.7 2017-09-07 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## rtracklayer * 1.40.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## rvcheck 0.0.9 2017-07-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## S4Vectors * 0.18.1 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## scales 0.5.0 2017-08-24 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## splines 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## stats * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## stats4 * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## stringi 1.1.7 2018-03-12 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## stringr 1.3.0 2018-02-19 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## SummarizedExperiment * 1.10.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## survival 2.42-3 2018-04-16 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## tibble 1.4.2 2018-01-22 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## tidyr 0.8.0 2018-01-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## tools 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## tweenr 0.1.5 2016-10-10 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## udunits2 0.13 2016-11-17 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## units 0.5-1 2018-01-08 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## UpSetR 1.3.3 2017-03-21 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## utils * 3.5.0 2018-04-27 local
## VariantAnnotation 1.26.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## viridis 0.5.1 2018-03-29 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## viridisLite 0.3.0 2018-02-01 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## withr 2.1.2 2018-03-15 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## xfun 0.1 2018-01-22 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## XML 3.98-1.11 2018-04-16 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## xml2 1.2.0 2018-01-24 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## xtable 1.8-2 2016-02-05 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## XVector 0.20.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor
## yaml 2.1.19 2018-05-01 CRAN (R 3.5.0)
## zlibbioc 1.26.0 2018-05-01 Bioconductor5 Competing interests
No competing interests were disclosed.
6 Grant information
LCT and AEJ were supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R21 MH109956-01). LCT and AN were supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01 GM105705).
7 Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the members of Andrew Jaffe (Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins Medical Campus) and Alexis Battle (Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering at Johns Hopkins University) labs for feedback on the explanatory figures.
References
1. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nature methods. 2015;12(2):115–21.
2. Law CW, Alhamdoosh M, Su S, Smyth GK, Ritchie ME. RNA-seq analysis is easy as 1-2-3 with limma, Glimma and edgeR. F1000Research. 2016;5(May):1408.
3. Love MI, Anders S, Kim V, Huber W. RNA-Seq workflow: gene-level exploratory analysis and differential expression. F1000Research. 2016;4(May):1070.
4. Chen Y, Lun ATL, Smyth GK. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Research. 2016;5(May):1438.
5. Frazee AC, Langmead B, Leek JT. ReCount: A multi-experiment resource of analysis-ready RNA-seq gene count datasets. BMC bioinformatics. 2011;12:449.
6. Himes, E. B, Jiang, X., Wagner, P., et al. RNA-Seq Transcriptome Profiling Identifies CRISPLD2 as a Glucocorticoid Responsive Gene that Modulates Cytokine Function in Airway Smooth Muscle Cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99625.
7. Collado-Torres L, Nellore A, Kammers K, Ellis SE, Taub MA, Hansen KD, et al. Reproducible RNA-seq analysis using recount2. Nature Biotechnology. 2017 Apr;35(4):319–21.
8. Collado-Torres L, Nellore A, Frazee AC, Wilks C, Love MI, Langmead B, et al. Flexible expressed region analysis for RNA-seq with derfinder. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017 Jan;45(2):e9–9.
9. Morgan M, Obenchain V, Hester J, Pagès H. SummarizedExperiment: SummarizedExperiment container. 2017.
10. Wilks C, Gaddipati P, Nellore A, Langmead B. Snaptron: querying and visualizing splicing across tens of thousands of RNA-seq samples. bioRxiv. 2017;
11. Nellore A, Collado-Torres L, Jaffe AE, Alquicira-Hernández J, Wilks C, Pritt J, et al. Rail-RNA: Scalable analysis of RNA-seq splicing and coverage. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2016 Sep;
12. Lawrence M, Huber W, Pagès H, Aboyoun P, Carlson M, Gentleman R, et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS computational biology. 2013;9(8):e1003118.
13. Jaffe AE, Shin J, Collado-Torres L, Leek JT, Tao R, Li C, et al. Developmental regulation of human cortex transcription and its clinical relevance at single base resolution. Nature Neuroscience. 2015 Jan;18(1):154–61.
14. Ellis SE, Collado-Torres L, Leek J. Improving the value of public rna-seq expression data by phenotype prediction. bioRxiv. 2017;
15. Colaprico A, Silva TC, Olsen C, Garofano L, Cava C, Garolini D, et al. TCGAbiolinks: An r/bioconductor package for integrative analysis of tcga data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;
16. Law CW, Chen Y, Shi W, Smyth GK. Voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for rna-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R29.
17. Collado-Torres L, Jaffe AE, Leek JT. regionReport: Interactive reports for region-level and feature-level genomic analyses [version2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research. 2016 Jun;4:1–10.
18. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for rna-seq data with deseq2. Genome biology. 2014;15(12):1–21.
19. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010 Jan;26(1):139–40.
20. Marini F. Ideal: Interactive differential expression analysis. 2017.
21. Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. ClusterProfiler: An r package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2012;16(5):284–7.
22. Soneson C, Love MI, Robinson MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2015;4(0):1521.
23. Jaffe AE, Straub R, Shin JH, Tao R, Gao Y, Collado-Torres L, et al. Developmental and genetic regulation of the human cortex transcriptome in schizophrenia. bioRxiv. 2017;
24. Lawrence M, Gentleman R, Carey V. Rtracklayer: An r package for interfacing with genome browsers. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1841–2.
25. Bravo HC, Chelaru F, Smith L, Goldstein N, Kancherla J, Walter M, et al. Epivizr: R interface to epiviz web app. 2017.
26. Alasoo K. Wiggleplotr: Make read coverage plots from bigwig files. 2017.
27. Jaffe AE, Murakami P, Lee H, Leek JT, Fallin DM, Feinberg AP, et al. Bump hunting to identify differentially methylated regions in epigenetic epidemiology studies. International journal of epidemiology. 2012;41(1):200–9.
28. Smith M, Oleś A. BiocWorkflowTools: Tools to aid the development of bioconductor workflow packages. 2017.
29. Collado-Torres L, Nellore A, Jaffe AE. Recount workflow: Accessing over 70,000 human rna-seq samples with bioconductor [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research. 2017 Aug;6(1558).